<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reports say IBM had no idea about Appleâ€™s switch to Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/1404-ibm-had-no-idea-about-apples-switch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/1404-ibm-had-no-idea-about-apples-switch</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:53:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr Good</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/1404-ibm-had-no-idea-about-apples-switch#comment-2528</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/1404/ibm-had-no-idea-about-apples-switch/#comment-2528</guid>
		<description>IBM should occasionally read the news if they were caught by surprise about this.  That&#039;s just dumb. More than a year ago I read that Macs were being run on Intels for testing purposes. 
You write, &quot;Now, we sincerely think that Apple should be a little more open with their business partners.&quot; - but think about it, Who are you and what do you know? It could be that IBM was misrepresenting what they would and could do for Apple and stringing them on. Perhaps IBM wasn&#039;t the best partner either - ?? IBM and Apple will both be fine.  Controversy should be expected and welcomed from Apple. It gives you something to have an opinion about - although your naivete about business is a little scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM should occasionally read the news if they were caught by surprise about this.  That&#8217;s just dumb. More than a year ago I read that Macs were being run on Intels for testing purposes.<br />
You write, &#8220;Now, we sincerely think that Apple should be a little more open with their business partners.&#8221; &#8211; but think about it, Who are you and what do you know? It could be that IBM was misrepresenting what they would and could do for Apple and stringing them on. Perhaps IBM wasn&#8217;t the best partner either &#8211; ?? IBM and Apple will both be fine.  Controversy should be expected and welcomed from Apple. It gives you something to have an opinion about &#8211; although your naivete about business is a little scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
