<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DotCanada: This Company makes Indian web hosting companies look good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/160-dotcanada-this-company-makes-indian-web-hosting-companies-look-good/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/160-dotcanada-this-company-makes-indian-web-hosting-companies-look-good</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff R</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/160-dotcanada-this-company-makes-indian-web-hosting-companies-look-good#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/160/dotcanada-this-company-makes-indian-web-hosting-companies-look-good/#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>I like the title of this page, I feel it bang on about dotcanada. They are simply one of the the worst hosting companies online today. I accidently signed up for them last year and it was one of the biggest headaches of my year. If you don&#039;t care about how often your sites goes down then I&#039;de say go with them but if you have any respect for your website then consider going elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the title of this page, I feel it bang on about dotcanada. They are simply one of the the worst hosting companies online today. I accidently signed up for them last year and it was one of the biggest headaches of my year. If you don&#8217;t care about how often your sites goes down then I&#8217;de say go with them but if you have any respect for your website then consider going elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
