<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution of the Bittorrent to mainstream market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/1633-evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/1633-evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niranjan</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/1633-evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>Niranjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/1633/evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market/#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>Ok, I promise, this is going to be the last comment...

Traditionally, when a file is to be downloaded...
-Initial search is broadcast to all clients
-A list of having the file is built
-Downloading starts from few selected clients
-Now, till the file is downloaded, further communication is only with these selected clients. this means the network is no longer jammed with protocol packets.

Contrast this with BitTorrent...
-It searches and builds a list of clients having the requested chunk which is usually of size 128kb+
-So if a file is of n chunks, this protocol packets keep jamming the network n times till the download finishes.

So, i wonder, if this overhead is justified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I promise, this is going to be the last comment&#8230;</p>
<p>Traditionally, when a file is to be downloaded&#8230;<br />
-Initial search is broadcast to all clients<br />
-A list of having the file is built<br />
-Downloading starts from few selected clients<br />
-Now, till the file is downloaded, further communication is only with these selected clients. this means the network is no longer jammed with protocol packets.</p>
<p>Contrast this with BitTorrent&#8230;<br />
-It searches and builds a list of clients having the requested chunk which is usually of size 128kb+<br />
-So if a file is of n chunks, this protocol packets keep jamming the network n times till the download finishes.</p>
<p>So, i wonder, if this overhead is justified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niranjan</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/1633-evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Niranjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/1633/evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market/#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>One more comment...
Seeing the files available for download in sizes GB [GigaByte] common, I belive we can bid farewell to the good old cd&#039;s... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more comment&#8230;<br />
Seeing the files available for download in sizes GB [GigaByte] common, I belive we can bid farewell to the good old cd&#8217;s&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niranjan</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/1633-evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>Niranjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/1633/evolution-of-the-bittorrent-to-mainstream-market/#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>Nice article...
The article does not talk about the disadvantages of the BitTorrent protocol: It downloads/request each chunk of file from 5 sources and often ends up with around 5% of file size as discarded data :(( : i was just wondering is it justifiable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article&#8230;<br />
The article does not talk about the disadvantages of the BitTorrent protocol: It downloads/request each chunk of file from 5 sources and often ends up with around 5% of file size as discarded data :(( : i was just wondering is it justifiable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
