Intel Reverse-Engineered AMD64

AddThis Feed Button

April 6th, 2004 Leave a comment Visited 57 times, 1 so far today

After investigating the instruction sets used by 64-bit chips from AMD and Intel, an industry analyst has concluded that Intel reverse-engineered the AMD64 instruction set to create its own 64-bit microprocessor architecture.

Tom Halfhill, an analyst at In-Stat/MDR in San Jose, said Monday that he had compared the instruction sets of AMD’s 64-bit chips, called AMD64, with the 64-bit extensions to be used in the Intel Xeon processor and future desktop chips. The smoking gun, Halfhill said, was Intel’s choice to mimic a decision AMD made in its early Opteron designs, and later reversed.

Speculation that Intel had reverse-engineered AMD’s processor began circulating almost immediately after Intel announced its own 64-bit plans in February. AMD announced plans to develop its 64-bit Opteron processor, then code-named “Hammer”, in Oct. 2001, and began shipping it in April 2003. Intel’s “Nocona”, the first chip to use its own 64-bit extensions, will launch this quarter with the Intel Extended Memory 64 Technology, or “Intel EM64T”.

While exactly copying a processor’s microarchitecture would be illegal, creating a compatible product through the use of an original “clean room” design is legally protected. According to Halfhill, Intel clearly reverse-engineered AMD’s products, a tactic AMD and other X86 chip designers have used to quickly catch up to Intel’s historical leadership in the design of new microprocessors.

extremetech





TechWhack on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

3 Comments

  1. #
    Wayne Bienek
    October 20th, 2004 at 5:04 pm

    Im glad they did.. now we might have a chance at compatability.

    Reply to this comment
  2. #
    Dr.McStack
    October 20th, 2004 at 8:57 pm

    Sauce for the goose I’m for one glad.

    I would just like to say bring it we need more stuff
    how about an afordable 4Gig FFD solid state hard drive

    Reply to this comment
  3. #
    junoo
    October 21st, 2004 at 12:44 am

    Competion and compatability is good for the consumers but hooray to amd for beating intel at its own game!

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Related Posts

Popular Posts

blank