After investigating the instruction sets used by 64-bit chips from AMD and Intel, an industry analyst has concluded that Intel reverse-engineered the AMD64 instruction set to create its own 64-bit microprocessor architecture.
Tom Halfhill, an analyst at In-Stat/MDR in San Jose, said Monday that he had compared the instruction sets of AMD’s 64-bit chips, called AMD64, with the 64-bit extensions to be used in the Intel Xeon processor and future desktop chips. The smoking gun, Halfhill said, was Intel’s choice to mimic a decision AMD made in its early Opteron designs, and later reversed.
Speculation that Intel had reverse-engineered AMD’s processor began circulating almost immediately after Intel announced its own 64-bit plans in February. AMD announced plans to develop its 64-bit Opteron processor, then code-named “Hammer”, in Oct. 2001, and began shipping it in April 2003. Intel’s “Nocona”, the first chip to use its own 64-bit extensions, will launch this quarter with the Intel Extended Memory 64 Technology, or “Intel EM64T”.
While exactly copying a processor’s microarchitecture would be illegal, creating a compatible product through the use of an original “clean room” design is legally protected. According to Halfhill, Intel clearly reverse-engineered AMD’s products, a tactic AMD and other X86 chip designers have used to quickly catch up to Intel’s historical leadership in the design of new microprocessors.
|
TechWhack on Facebook
|

October 20th, 2004 at 5:04 pm
Im glad they did.. now we might have a chance at compatability.
October 20th, 2004 at 8:57 pm
Sauce for the goose I’m for one glad.
I would just like to say bring it we need more stuff
how about an afordable 4Gig FFD solid state hard drive
October 21st, 2004 at 12:44 am
Competion and compatability is good for the consumers but hooray to amd for beating intel at its own game!