<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA postpone more space shuttle changes for launch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/3540-shuttle-changes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/3540-shuttle-changes</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:53:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James T. Clemons</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/3540-shuttle-changes#comment-11084</link>
		<dc:creator>James T. Clemons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/3540/shuttle-changes/#comment-11084</guid>
		<description>Had the Space shuttle been placed on top of the booster rockets instead of on the side there would have been no problems with falling debris and in my opinion may have prevented the first shuttle disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the Space shuttle been placed on top of the booster rockets instead of on the side there would have been no problems with falling debris and in my opinion may have prevented the first shuttle disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
