<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel having a hard time competing with AMD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>I have owned only AMD since the K5.  I have always cheered for the small guy.  I believe this is showing I will have a dilemma in this regard, &amp; possibly soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have owned only AMD since the K5.  I have always cheered for the small guy.  I believe this is showing I will have a dilemma in this regard, &#038; possibly soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Mama</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Its like when IBM had the better systems out there and they didn&#039;t compete well. It&#039;s all in the marketing... Those goddamned Intel commercials, even my mother won&#039;t buy a computer that doesn&#039;t have that logo on it and she can&#039;t even say why. It&#039;s because of those stupid commercials.
AMD is better bang for the buck. Not saying it&#039;s a better proc although it might be, I don&#039;t care. 
Itanium Centrino Celeron Xeon blah blah blah... just make a friggin proc and tell us how it performs in a useful way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its like when IBM had the better systems out there and they didn&#8217;t compete well. It&#8217;s all in the marketing&#8230; Those goddamned Intel commercials, even my mother won&#8217;t buy a computer that doesn&#8217;t have that logo on it and she can&#8217;t even say why. It&#8217;s because of those stupid commercials.<br />
AMD is better bang for the buck. Not saying it&#8217;s a better proc although it might be, I don&#8217;t care.<br />
Itanium Centrino Celeron Xeon blah blah blah&#8230; just make a friggin proc and tell us how it performs in a useful way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Captain, the Klingons have damaged the Impulse Engines and the Warp Drive.  The CPU manufacturer used flaky NMOS technology and the Klingons fried us with one photon torpedo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain, the Klingons have damaged the Impulse Engines and the Warp Drive.  The CPU manufacturer used flaky NMOS technology and the Klingons fried us with one photon torpedo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guthrie</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Guthrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Lol, you can yell all you want, but you have to remember WHY AMD was created, remember that IBM had the deal with Intel years ago, but as backup, in case Intel flopped, IBM made them GIVE their design idea&#039;s TO AMD (this of course was years ago, before the pentium), so that if Intel went under, IBM could still make computers.

So, AMD is Intel&#039;s baby, but guess what both have made consederable leaps in chips, but I would have to say, that AMD has outgrown its daddy (&quot;Who&#039;s your daddy?&quot; Yankee stadium), and they simply make better chips, and cheeper chips.

People think Intel is better cause they have never HEARD of AMD, they simply have the freeken &quot;intel inside&quot; commercails stuck in their head, marketing wise, Intel won, but if you look at preformance, and durabilty, along with price, AMD rocks the compitiion.

Thanks,
Guthrie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, you can yell all you want, but you have to remember WHY AMD was created, remember that IBM had the deal with Intel years ago, but as backup, in case Intel flopped, IBM made them GIVE their design idea&#8217;s TO AMD (this of course was years ago, before the pentium), so that if Intel went under, IBM could still make computers.</p>
<p>So, AMD is Intel&#8217;s baby, but guess what both have made consederable leaps in chips, but I would have to say, that AMD has outgrown its daddy (&#8221;Who&#8217;s your daddy?&#8221; Yankee stadium), and they simply make better chips, and cheeper chips.</p>
<p>People think Intel is better cause they have never HEARD of AMD, they simply have the freeken &#8220;intel inside&#8221; commercails stuck in their head, marketing wise, Intel won, but if you look at preformance, and durabilty, along with price, AMD rocks the compitiion.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Guthrie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedSocksRock</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>RedSocksRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Dont forget that AMD is more supsucptable to spyware than Intel is. Also, AMDs processors are for democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont forget that AMD is more supsucptable to spyware than Intel is. Also, AMDs processors are for democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Whitcomb</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Whitcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Sure would be nice when we get an operating system that takes advantage of 64 bit bandwidth. Some apps. would be nice to see too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure would be nice when we get an operating system that takes advantage of 64 bit bandwidth. Some apps. would be nice to see too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hall</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Re # 29
What the hell has stupid remarks of such an ignorant arab doing in a technical discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re # 29<br />
What the hell has stupid remarks of such an ignorant arab doing in a technical discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coder</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>coder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>blah blah blah blah,
Intel has been spanking AMD for 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah blah blah blah,<br />
Intel has been spanking AMD for 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amd's son</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Amd's son</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>AMD&#039;s daddy can beat up Intel&#039;s daddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD&#8217;s daddy can beat up Intel&#8217;s daddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/443-intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/443/intel-having-a-hard-time-competing-with-amd/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Intel has top notch engineers and with their focus on the duel processing, suspect they&#039;ll give AMD a run for their money (literally).  It must be added that Intel production capacity far exceeds the competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel has top notch engineers and with their focus on the duel processing, suspect they&#8217;ll give AMD a run for their money (literally).  It must be added that Intel production capacity far exceeds the competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
