<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Leading to Loss of Ad Revenues?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:53:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: garth</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>i dont trust ad&#039;s at all with all the malware , spyware etc even though my computer is pritty secure but the defence is made after the &quot;viruses&quot; are made so you never know. also advanced user&#039;s of computers will also not click on ad&#039;s because they know there way around if they wont some think they know were to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont trust ad&#8217;s at all with all the malware , spyware etc even though my computer is pritty secure but the defence is made after the &#8220;viruses&#8221; are made so you never know. also advanced user&#8217;s of computers will also not click on ad&#8217;s because they know there way around if they wont some think they know were to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Matamales</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Matamales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>This article is inaccurate.  Firefox does not &lt;i&gt;come with&lt;/i&gt; extensions that allow you to get rid of all ads, with the exception of the built in pop-up blocker.  The extensions I&#039;m assuming this author is mentioning must be downloaded elsewhere.  In fact, I would assume that most people who download Firefox don&#039;t even know about their existence.  

The fact is, people using Firefox are probably more savvy than the average computer user, and for that reason, they tend not to click on ads.  I have the extension alluded to in the article, but when I&#039;m not at my home computer, I &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; click on any ads, with the exception of maybe two in my whole life.  And those were for products I was already interested in.  I figure most people smart enough to pick up Firefox feel the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is inaccurate.  Firefox does not <i>come with</i> extensions that allow you to get rid of all ads, with the exception of the built in pop-up blocker.  The extensions I&#8217;m assuming this author is mentioning must be downloaded elsewhere.  In fact, I would assume that most people who download Firefox don&#8217;t even know about their existence.  </p>
<p>The fact is, people using Firefox are probably more savvy than the average computer user, and for that reason, they tend not to click on ads.  I have the extension alluded to in the article, but when I&#8217;m not at my home computer, I <i>never</i> click on any ads, with the exception of maybe two in my whole life.  And those were for products I was already interested in.  I figure most people smart enough to pick up Firefox feel the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Thornton</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Depends on the ad. Flash? Should be against the law. Animated/blinking/rotating GIFs? I block the serving computer permanently. Ads that mimic system messages or windows? I suggest the death penalty. Popups? Off to Guantanamo Bay you go.

Plain text ads, google style? I have no problem with them and if they are intelligently targeted even click on them a fair percentage of the time.

The problem is intelligence and ethics. Most ad-serving people are ethically bankrupt morons or criminals. Out-and-out crooks can&#039;t afford to buy ad space in the New Yorker or Time, but they&#039;re all over the mainstream web. We haven&#039;t scratched the surface of  consumer frustration over this kind of garbage.

Besides, the intrinsic value of a web site is almost always in inverse proportion to the amount of flashing/blinking/scrolling rubbish marching across the page. Ad types always think their stuff is &quot;vital&quot; but it almost never is. There&#039;s usually someone offering the same or better content elsewhere for free or with inobtrusive ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on the ad. Flash? Should be against the law. Animated/blinking/rotating GIFs? I block the serving computer permanently. Ads that mimic system messages or windows? I suggest the death penalty. Popups? Off to Guantanamo Bay you go.</p>
<p>Plain text ads, google style? I have no problem with them and if they are intelligently targeted even click on them a fair percentage of the time.</p>
<p>The problem is intelligence and ethics. Most ad-serving people are ethically bankrupt morons or criminals. Out-and-out crooks can&#8217;t afford to buy ad space in the New Yorker or Time, but they&#8217;re all over the mainstream web. We haven&#8217;t scratched the surface of  consumer frustration over this kind of garbage.</p>
<p>Besides, the intrinsic value of a web site is almost always in inverse proportion to the amount of flashing/blinking/scrolling rubbish marching across the page. Ad types always think their stuff is &#8220;vital&#8221; but it almost never is. There&#8217;s usually someone offering the same or better content elsewhere for free or with inobtrusive ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 03:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Jim,
You&#039;re right, there&#039;s always somebody paying for something, or putting in work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />
You&#8217;re right, there&#8217;s always somebody paying for something, or putting in work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Crookes</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Crookes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Theres no such thing as a free resource, and that includes the Web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theres no such thing as a free resource, and that includes the Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babak</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>babak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2004 10:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>please invite me for gmail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please invite me for gmail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gmail Resource</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Gmail Resource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>It may sound good to some having an ad free interest. However, many websites rely on ads to keep their site up. Commercial and non-commercial. Besides, do we really want an ad free internet? Maybe annoying ads such as popups and flash can go, but filtering out a text and banner ads will only hurt websites. I&#039;d be a little upset if people are sucking up some free services on my websites while filtering out the ads. I say compliment the webmaster and click a few ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may sound good to some having an ad free interest. However, many websites rely on ads to keep their site up. Commercial and non-commercial. Besides, do we really want an ad free internet? Maybe annoying ads such as popups and flash can go, but filtering out a text and banner ads will only hurt websites. I&#8217;d be a little upset if people are sucking up some free services on my websites while filtering out the ads. I say compliment the webmaster and click a few ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyndicate</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/554-firefox-ad-revenues#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyndicate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/554/firefox-ad-revenues/#comment-579</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting. Some websites rely on ads to keep their site up. Commercial and non-commercial. Besides, do we really want an ad free internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting. Some websites rely on ads to keep their site up. Commercial and non-commercial. Besides, do we really want an ad free internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
