<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s deal with Giant Software has glitches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/597-microsoft-giant-issues/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/597-microsoft-giant-issues</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:14:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: saran</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/597-microsoft-giant-issues#comment-7268</link>
		<dc:creator>saran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/597/microsoft-giant-issues/#comment-7268</guid>
		<description>your company create a new softwares indetail&amp;information send my e-mail id.thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your company create a new softwares indetail&amp;information send my e-mail id.thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/597-microsoft-giant-issues#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/597/microsoft-giant-issues/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute - Microsoft writes programs with flaws that allow spyware to exist in the first place, then tries to buy a company that writes software to protect Microsoft&#039;s end-users against Microsoft&#039;s shoddy products, but can&#039;t because another company owns parts of the protection software?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute &#8211; Microsoft writes programs with flaws that allow spyware to exist in the first place, then tries to buy a company that writes software to protect Microsoft&#8217;s end-users against Microsoft&#8217;s shoddy products, but can&#8217;t because another company owns parts of the protection software?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/597-microsoft-giant-issues#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/597/microsoft-giant-issues/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Sunbelt Software had better be very careful and hire lawyers to cover their @sses, because Microsoft has screwed other companies in the past in similar situations.

If you recall there was a program used with DOS called SpeedDisk I think, and soon after when Windows came out, it included SpeedDisk (a scaled down version) and the original company got diddly squat.

Then there was Stacker, a licensed product.  Once again, Microsoft took the code and used it in their Windows product, cutting out Stacker.  Microsoft then renamed the product Double Space.

All they do is use their ownership to look at the code, then a month or so later they come out with their own product based on the same code.

Sunbelt will be SOL soon thereafter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunbelt Software had better be very careful and hire lawyers to cover their @sses, because Microsoft has screwed other companies in the past in similar situations.</p>
<p>If you recall there was a program used with DOS called SpeedDisk I think, and soon after when Windows came out, it included SpeedDisk (a scaled down version) and the original company got diddly squat.</p>
<p>Then there was Stacker, a licensed product.  Once again, Microsoft took the code and used it in their Windows product, cutting out Stacker.  Microsoft then renamed the product Double Space.</p>
<p>All they do is use their ownership to look at the code, then a month or so later they come out with their own product based on the same code.</p>
<p>Sunbelt will be SOL soon thereafter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/597-microsoft-giant-issues#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 22:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/597/microsoft-giant-issues/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Microsoft finds that it can&#039;t use something because another company &quot;owns&quot; the idea? How ironic :-p.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft finds that it can&#8217;t use something because another company &#8220;owns&#8221; the idea? How ironic :-p.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
