<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T to charge $175 as cancellation fee for Apple iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/6031-cancellation-fee-apple-iphone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/6031-cancellation-fee-apple-iphone</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:14:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: marybeth s.</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/6031-cancellation-fee-apple-iphone#comment-421368</link>
		<dc:creator>marybeth s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/6031/cancellation-fee-apple-iphone/#comment-421368</guid>
		<description>ya....this complaint makes no sense. AT&amp;T gives you a huge discount when you buy the iphone at a 2 yr contract price. Retail is 5 or 6 hundred dollars, and the new 2 yr contract price is $199, so obviously you get the same early termination fee. Otherwise someone could just open the acct get the cheapest plan for 2 months cancel it and keep the iphone at the 3 or 4 hundred dollar discount. How techwhack allows this embarassing &quot;complaint&quot; to stay up is beyond me. Something tells me whoever wrote it is just trying to promo the competitor in some non-slick way or another...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya&#8230;.this complaint makes no sense. AT&amp;T gives you a huge discount when you buy the iphone at a 2 yr contract price. Retail is 5 or 6 hundred dollars, and the new 2 yr contract price is $199, so obviously you get the same early termination fee. Otherwise someone could just open the acct get the cheapest plan for 2 months cancel it and keep the iphone at the 3 or 4 hundred dollar discount. How techwhack allows this embarassing &#8220;complaint&#8221; to stay up is beyond me. Something tells me whoever wrote it is just trying to promo the competitor in some non-slick way or another&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne thompson</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/6031-cancellation-fee-apple-iphone#comment-125887</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/6031/cancellation-fee-apple-iphone/#comment-125887</guid>
		<description>(what is this article) I am a cingular customer this policy is standard for all contracts not just the iphone.  If people would just not stretch fact to make a new product look bad just because they do not like it or just want to fill up space on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(what is this article) I am a cingular customer this policy is standard for all contracts not just the iphone.  If people would just not stretch fact to make a new product look bad just because they do not like it or just want to fill up space on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
