<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe states that user has no risk from PDF attachment spam mails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/6269-pdf-attachment-spam-mails/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/6269-pdf-attachment-spam-mails</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/6269-pdf-attachment-spam-mails#comment-167573</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/6269/pdf-attachment-spam-mails/#comment-167573</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that Adobe went ahead and cleared this up for all users who were unaware of this. Although the PDFs themselves do not pose a threat, the high rate of PDF spam being received hogs a company&#039;s bandwidth, increasing costs and reducing network performance. So it&#039;s important that users are aware that this is actually spam, and network admins should update their spam tool to ensure such mails are blocked, ideally at server level. I&#039;ve recently ran across a free white paper which talks about this particular subject: http://www.gfi.com/whitepapers/attachment-spam.pdf - it&#039;s a pretty good read for further insight on this type of spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that Adobe went ahead and cleared this up for all users who were unaware of this. Although the PDFs themselves do not pose a threat, the high rate of PDF spam being received hogs a company&#8217;s bandwidth, increasing costs and reducing network performance. So it&#8217;s important that users are aware that this is actually spam, and network admins should update their spam tool to ensure such mails are blocked, ideally at server level. I&#8217;ve recently ran across a free white paper which talks about this particular subject: <a href="http://www.gfi.com/whitepapers/attachment-spam.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.gfi.com/whitepapers/attachment-spam.pdf</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s a pretty good read for further insight on this type of spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
