<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bajaj Auto to sue TVS Motors on Patent Infringement!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/6384-bajaj-auto-to-sue-tvs-motors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/6384-bajaj-auto-to-sue-tvs-motors</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:53:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vijaykumar Chowbe</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/6384-bajaj-auto-to-sue-tvs-motors#comment-167279</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijaykumar Chowbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/6384/bajaj-auto-to-sue-tvs-motors/#comment-167279</guid>
		<description>I have gone the article circulated via http://news.techwhack.com/6384/bajaj-auto-to-sue-tvs-motors/ under the caption &quot;Bajaj Auto to sue TVS Motors on Patent Infringement!&quot;.  I think that this news is given in abayance.  If Bajaj Auto is sure about its infringment, they must adopt the infringment suit in District Court where defendant would have its head office of working, or having business.  and If they are not sure about the infringment, they should keep silence, because, such types of news may give the impression in the mind of the layman that another company has actually infringed the patent, but Bajaj Auto themselves (as reflect from this news) are not sure about that their patent number 195904 granted for said DTS-i technology on July 7, 2005 is actually occured or not.  the news wihtout proper confirmantion, if leaked in media, give undew advantage to opponant and they are having right to file counter suit for &#039;libel&#039; as appear from their intention.  Therefore, it is proper, that if Bajaj Auto is actually feel proper that their patent has got infrignemtn by competitor, they first get it confirmed and file and injunction suit to restrain them.  Such news would spoil the repuatation of both in the market, and hardly seems to be carved out of real truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have gone the article circulated via <a href="http://news.techwhack.com/6384/bajaj-auto-to-sue-tvs-motors/" rel="nofollow">http://news.techwhack.com/6384/bajaj-auto-to-sue-tvs-motors/</a> under the caption &#8220;Bajaj Auto to sue TVS Motors on Patent Infringement!&#8221;.  I think that this news is given in abayance.  If Bajaj Auto is sure about its infringment, they must adopt the infringment suit in District Court where defendant would have its head office of working, or having business.  and If they are not sure about the infringment, they should keep silence, because, such types of news may give the impression in the mind of the layman that another company has actually infringed the patent, but Bajaj Auto themselves (as reflect from this news) are not sure about that their patent number 195904 granted for said DTS-i technology on July 7, 2005 is actually occured or not.  the news wihtout proper confirmantion, if leaked in media, give undew advantage to opponant and they are having right to file counter suit for &#8216;libel&#8217; as appear from their intention.  Therefore, it is proper, that if Bajaj Auto is actually feel proper that their patent has got infrignemtn by competitor, they first get it confirmed and file and injunction suit to restrain them.  Such news would spoil the repuatation of both in the market, and hardly seems to be carved out of real truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
