<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM vs. SCO Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/685-ibm-vs-sco-group/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/685-ibm-vs-sco-group</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: USer</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/685-ibm-vs-sco-group#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>USer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/685/ibm-vs-sco-group/#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think SCO has case here. If IBM will have used some SCO code and make it open for Linux, SCO should be able to tell from which like to which line the code had been used without authorization. SCO haven&#039;t made that. It seems that this is just to try to scare Linux users away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think SCO has case here. If IBM will have used some SCO code and make it open for Linux, SCO should be able to tell from which like to which line the code had been used without authorization. SCO haven&#8217;t made that. It seems that this is just to try to scare Linux users away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
