<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Napster Launches To Go Service for Music Subscription</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/712-napster-to-go-service/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/712-napster-to-go-service</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stein</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/712-napster-to-go-service#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/712/napster-to-go-service/#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>I love the iPod.  But Apple&#039;s claim that music ownership is better than music rental has a major flaw.  When Apple &quot;sells&quot; us songs via iTunes, they are not really selling us something.  We are simply paying for the right to hear a song on Apple&#039;s platform.  A &quot;purchased&quot; iTunes song will not play on any other player (other than iTunes or iPod).  What happens to your purchase when your iPod dies and you decide to by someone else&#039;s device to replace it.  The songs you &quot;purchased&quot; are now worthless.  Actually, to me this sounds somewhat like a rental, due to the restricted rights that comes with this monetary exchange.  When I rent a car, I am not allowed paint it a different color (or drive it into the ground).  When I buy a car I can do whatever I want to it.  All of a sudden iTunes at $.99 sounds awfully expensive given that its sound quality is a lot lower than a CD (iTunes songs are compressed) and given that it will only work as long as my iPod does.  Egads Apple.  Great design, but poor total customer experience --&gt; I thought you were supposed to be thoughtful about total customer experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the iPod.  But Apple&#8217;s claim that music ownership is better than music rental has a major flaw.  When Apple &#8220;sells&#8221; us songs via iTunes, they are not really selling us something.  We are simply paying for the right to hear a song on Apple&#8217;s platform.  A &#8220;purchased&#8221; iTunes song will not play on any other player (other than iTunes or iPod).  What happens to your purchase when your iPod dies and you decide to by someone else&#8217;s device to replace it.  The songs you &#8220;purchased&#8221; are now worthless.  Actually, to me this sounds somewhat like a rental, due to the restricted rights that comes with this monetary exchange.  When I rent a car, I am not allowed paint it a different color (or drive it into the ground).  When I buy a car I can do whatever I want to it.  All of a sudden iTunes at $.99 sounds awfully expensive given that its sound quality is a lot lower than a CD (iTunes songs are compressed) and given that it will only work as long as my iPod does.  Egads Apple.  Great design, but poor total customer experience &#8211;> I thought you were supposed to be thoughtful about total customer experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto Mantilla</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/712-napster-to-go-service#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto Mantilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 05:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/712/napster-to-go-service/#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>Competition is good for consumers, it is a shame that iTunes only play on their IPOD even though one was paying.
I am glad for Napster to be so forward, itunes was not such a great deal anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition is good for consumers, it is a shame that iTunes only play on their IPOD even though one was paying.<br />
I am glad for Napster to be so forward, itunes was not such a great deal anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
