<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google sued for images hosted by Google Street View service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/7399-google-street-view/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/7399-google-street-view</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/7399-google-street-view#comment-385179</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/?p=7399#comment-385179</guid>
		<description>Google really messed up on this.  

A.  They broke the law when they trespassed on the property to take a picture of a house.

B.  Their defense that they make it easy to remove images from their system is absurd.  Is Google suggesting that we should be constantly surfing their website (and their competitors website, if others follow in their path), just to check to be sure that they have posted illegal content?

Googles position on this is so wrong that this will prove to be a public relations nightmare for a company that has not had a bad reputation up to this point.  The correct response would have been to say, &quot;We made a mistake, we should not have trespassed to take this picture.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google really messed up on this.  </p>
<p>A.  They broke the law when they trespassed on the property to take a picture of a house.</p>
<p>B.  Their defense that they make it easy to remove images from their system is absurd.  Is Google suggesting that we should be constantly surfing their website (and their competitors website, if others follow in their path), just to check to be sure that they have posted illegal content?</p>
<p>Googles position on this is so wrong that this will prove to be a public relations nightmare for a company that has not had a bad reputation up to this point.  The correct response would have been to say, &#8220;We made a mistake, we should not have trespassed to take this picture.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
