<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhapsody renews its challenge for Apple iTunes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/7927-rhapsody-itunes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/7927-rhapsody-itunes</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/7927-rhapsody-itunes#comment-403460</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/?p=7927#comment-403460</guid>
		<description>They are only &#039;embracing&#039; the iPod because the majors labels are colluding to let them, in an attempt to reduce the iTMS market share.  This is not about growing the market, but selectively killing a specific distributor.  They can&#039;t get together and stop selling through the iTMS, as that would definitely appear anti-competitive AND cost them lots of money in lost sales.  Instead, they are going for keeping iTMS crippled as much as possible with DRM, while letting the competition go DRM-free, yet keep the same or lower prices than the iTMS.  If this process works, and iTMS&#039;s market share is greatly reduced, you can then welcome DRM back, along with higher prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are only &#8216;embracing&#8217; the iPod because the majors labels are colluding to let them, in an attempt to reduce the iTMS market share.  This is not about growing the market, but selectively killing a specific distributor.  They can&#8217;t get together and stop selling through the iTMS, as that would definitely appear anti-competitive AND cost them lots of money in lost sales.  Instead, they are going for keeping iTMS crippled as much as possible with DRM, while letting the competition go DRM-free, yet keep the same or lower prices than the iTMS.  If this process works, and iTMS&#8217;s market share is greatly reduced, you can then welcome DRM back, along with higher prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
