<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft BrowseRank to take on Google PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.techwhack.com/8088-microsoft-browserank/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.techwhack.com/8088-microsoft-browserank</link>
	<description>News from the Tech and IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: World Travel Guide</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/8088-microsoft-browserank#comment-406553</link>
		<dc:creator>World Travel Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/?p=8088#comment-406553</guid>
		<description>I like the Idea of BrowseRank over
PageRank. PageRank is complicated
and Google uses it in any manner
company wants. I always believed
Google method of ranking is stupid
and unfair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Idea of BrowseRank over<br />
PageRank. PageRank is complicated<br />
and Google uses it in any manner<br />
company wants. I always believed<br />
Google method of ranking is stupid<br />
and unfair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginevra Figg</title>
		<link>http://news.techwhack.com/8088-microsoft-browserank#comment-406516</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginevra Figg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techwhack.com/?p=8088#comment-406516</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, although this has been tried before.  DirectHit had a search engine built entirely on clickstream data (Acquired by Ask.com in 2000).  They got the data from ISPs in those days.  The end-result is really not that much better than Page-Rank.  

We at Me.dium on the other hand (http://me.dium.com/search) are processing our user&#039;s clickstream data in real-time to create a different lens based on what&#039;s going on now.  e.g. do a search for John Edwards on Google or Live, and you get johnedwards.com and wiki/johnedwards.  Do the same search on Me.dium and you learn that today people care about his love child, pictures of his mistress, etc.

The difference is real-time (what people are browsing now) vs. historical (what they browsed in the past).  Social vs. Old School.  Check it out and let us know your thoughts.  http://me.dium.com/search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, although this has been tried before.  DirectHit had a search engine built entirely on clickstream data (Acquired by Ask.com in 2000).  They got the data from ISPs in those days.  The end-result is really not that much better than Page-Rank.  </p>
<p>We at Me.dium on the other hand (<a href="http://me.dium.com/search" rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search</a>) are processing our user&#8217;s clickstream data in real-time to create a different lens based on what&#8217;s going on now.  e.g. do a search for John Edwards on Google or Live, and you get johnedwards.com and wiki/johnedwards.  Do the same search on Me.dium and you learn that today people care about his love child, pictures of his mistress, etc.</p>
<p>The difference is real-time (what people are browsing now) vs. historical (what they browsed in the past).  Social vs. Old School.  Check it out and let us know your thoughts.  <a href="http://me.dium.com/search." rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
